One reason that so many students struggle with the chain rule is that they never really got the point of composition in the first place. Sure they can “put one function inside another,” but they are missing this essential point:
Composite functions appear in situations where the value of one quantity is determined by another, which in turn is determined by another.
Functions appear in situations where the value of one quantity is determined by the value of another.
Understanding composition this way builds a natural bridge between related rates and the idea of composition. For example, consider the following scenarios:
A balloon’s radius is a function of its volume, which is a function of time.
The depth of water in a cone is a function of the water’s volume, which is a function of time.
The angle of a camera pointing at a rocket depends on the height of the rocket, which is a function of time.
All three of these examples are classic related rates problems, but they are also clear examples of composition if your understanding of composition is that “one quantity depends on another, which depends on another.” For example, if radius r depends on volume V, which depends on time t, then r(v(t)), the value of a composite function, is the radius of the balloon at a specific time t.
Having established this conceptual connection between composite functions and related rates of change, you are now poised to introduce related rates before the chain rule, leveraging common-sense ideas to give intuition for what the chain rule means and why it works.
If you like this and want a copy of my whole book, please click here.
Leave a Reply